THIS LAND IS MY LAND
By Mark Reed
My career in the real estate business has consisted almost exclusively of real estate acquisition. Reed Realty has not been, for the most part, a firm that listed, advertised and sold real estate, other than in the early days when dad first opened for business and sold houses during the 50’s. We have pretty much represented purchasers, doing site selection and site acquisition for them. That includes my representing different clients over the years acquiring fast food and other commercial sites, electrical transmission line right of way, pipeline right of way, cellular tower sites and zonings and permits for all sorts of commercial projects.
This story concerns a cross-country electrical transmission line right of way I acquired, which ran approximately parallel to GA 400 in the Cumming, Forsyth County, Georgia area. I recently wrote another story about this project titled “Are You Afraid?” After writing that one, this one popped into my head as worthy of sharing, and it even has a “moral to the story” aspect.
A little Cliff Notes information so you will better understand the process of such a project. The electric power company engineers will determine that there is a need for more electric power in an area. The Land Department real estate people will work with them fine tuning and identifying a preliminary route for the transmission line. The Land people will get survey permission from property owners. After some tweaking of the route, the surveyor and title attorney will work together identifying property ownership and specifically describing the route so that an acquisition guy, like myself, can then go out and contact the property owner. I would be given survey strip maps, usually on an aerial photograph blue line. This survey would show the boundaries of properties the right of way would cross, property line to property line, identifying the distance across the property, the width of the right of way easement and the amount of acreage involved in the easement for acquisition.
I remember being warned by the surveyor and attorney that the owner of a particular tract would be particularly difficult to deal with, based upon their experience and knowledge of said individual. I met with the owner, a farmer who owned a large tract of land. The transmission line right of way had been designed and located so as to impact his property as little as possible, running along property lines and across open pasture wherever possible. I laid out my big aerial survey and pointed out his land situated thereon. I showed him where we would enter his property on the south end and exit his property on the north end. He said not a word, but he did nod his head.
I told him that our 50’ wide easement across approximately 2,000 feet of his farm took up just over two acres of land. It was pretty standard that in most cases you would pay someone a percentage of the per acre value of the land, say 50% or so. That would vary depending on the impact on the land, and since it was a negotiation, could vary even more. Just so you know, the power company has the right of eminent domain, which meant that if you could not reach an agreement with a property owner, your last resort was condemnation through the courts. That was an expensive process, and was avoided if possible, even to the point of paying someone more than a court would likely award a property owner. So, I always tried to be more than fair with them.
I don’t remember the exact amount I offered the farmer for the easement. I seem to remember it being around $10,000.00. I do remember that he did not hesitate to agree right there on the spot. I was really impressed with myself for the marvelous job I did in my presentation and negotiation, if you can call it that. I wrote him a draft and he signed the easement. Done deal! I drove off, hardly able to contain myself with pride. The project manager was going to be very happy. I couldn’t wait to tell the surveyor and attorney how I “handled” the property owner who was supposed to be so difficult.
I had an appointment with the adjoining property owner a little later that afternoon. As I spread out my maps and showed him where we crossed his property, he said, “Fine, but what about the southern part of my land? Don’t you want an easement across it, too?” I pointed out to him that the land he was referring to belonged to the farmer I had just left and had already acquired an easement across, including the land now being pointed out to me as his. The farmer smiled at me and said, “Well, sonny, that there be my land you just paid someone else for.” My stomach sank.
I realized that the previous property owner I had such an easy time with saw right off that our survey was wrong in identifying what property was his. In fact, our survey incorrectly showed the previous owner’s land by more than double. Instead of about an acre of land, I had paid him for over two acres, of which he obviously knew he did not own. It was common practice for me to confirm with the property owner exactly where we crossed their land. I had done so with the previous guy, but I now remembered that he never opened his mouth when I pointed out where we crossed his land. He just nodded his head. No wonder he was so easy to deal with. I had just paid him twice what he should have gotten.
I immediately revisited the first farmer. He met me with a big smile. I guess so. Maybe he thought I was there to give him money for someone else’s property again. He knew exactly why I was back. Therefore the smile. When I explained that our map was incorrect and that I had paid him for land that was not his, he just smiled all the more. He informed me he had just returned from his bank where he had deposited my draft. He further told me that he had no intention of returning the money.
My triumphant return to the office was not exactly how I had imagined it would be. I explained what had happened, and sure enough, we were able to determine that the surveyor and attorney, who had proofed and approved the final plans, had both made a mistake. It was really the attorney who had the last word in confirming the property ownership, as depicted by the surveyor. He goofed. The fail-safe, which was my confirming with the property owner that our survey was correct, also failed.
I learned a valuable lesson. Nodding of the head does not necessarily mean agreement. Believe me, thereafter I always made sure I got an owner to verbally confirm his ownership was correctly depicted. We could have probably won the case if we had decided to go to court against the property owner. It was decided, from a public relations standpoint, to not pursue that route. The title attorney had screwed up and the company went to him for restitution because of his mistake. His insurance paid. The surveyor was probably culpable, too, but it was the attorney’s responsibility to make sure his survey was correct.
No one blamed me for what happened, although I beat myself up pretty good for being snookered by the wily old farmer. I did not like the smile he gave me. Oh well, maybe there was some karma for him down the road. The moral of the story? Always get verbal confirmation.
One last note. The easement document was amended and thereafter had language included that the Grantor (the property owner) affirmed that the property survey and description was correct.
Recent Comments